Graham Dumpleton
graham.dumpleton at gmail.com
Thu Dec 13 21:17:15 EST 2007
On 14/12/2007, Tom Wells <drshade at gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 13, 2007 11:03 AM, Graham Dumpleton <graham.dumpleton at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > The only other away around it would be to not use mod_python specific > > features and write your application as WSGI application instead. You > > could then use mod_wsgi, with embedded mode used on Windows and on > > UNIX systems use daemon mode with a single multitheaded daemon > > processes. > > > > You can compare how mod_wsgi is same/different to mod_python in > > respect of process use at: > > > > > > Yep, WSGI sounds great, and actually would probably work very nicely in a > pure apache solution, my issue is that I need to build a similar adapter for > Windows IIS, so I think it may be best to work at a lower level such as > mod_python (and pywin32 for the IIS side). For WSGI on IIS see: http://code.google.com/p/isapi-wsgi/ That way you should be able to use the sam code base. Graham
|