Tom Wells
drshade at gmail.com
Thu Dec 13 08:43:00 EST 2007
On Dec 13, 2007 11:03 AM, Graham Dumpleton <graham.dumpleton at gmail.com> wrote: > The only other away around it would be to not use mod_python specific > features and write your application as WSGI application instead. You > could then use mod_wsgi, with embedded mode used on Windows and on > UNIX systems use daemon mode with a single multitheaded daemon > processes. > > You can compare how mod_wsgi is same/different to mod_python in > respect of process use at: > > Yep, WSGI sounds great, and actually would probably work very nicely in a pure apache solution, my issue is that I need to build a similar adapter for Windows IIS, so I think it may be best to work at a lower level such as mod_python (and pywin32 for the IIS side). Graham, thanks - you've been a huge help, it's great to know that there is someone of your "caliber" supporting mod_python, it makes the choice of using the technology far easier for me. All the best for the festive season, Tom -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm_cfg_has_not_been_edited_to_set_host_domains/pipermail/mod_python/attachments/20071213/8d7a48c1/attachment-0001.html
|