Graham Dumpleton
graham.dumpleton at gmail.com
Thu Dec 13 04:03:57 EST 2007
On 13/12/2007, Tom Wells <drshade at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Dec 13, 2007 10:13 AM, Graham Dumpleton <graham.dumpleton at gmail.com> > wrote: > > If you expect state to be available in each Apache child process when > > run on UNIX, you cant avoid having multiple distinct connections back > > to the back end system to collect the data. Playing with the C API > > post config hook isn't going to help you. > > > > If a connection from each Apache child process is okay, then use > > PythonImport directive to import a module on process startup which > > does any once of initialisation. > > > > Hi Graham - thanks for the quick reply! > Your response is what I expected (sharing of data between child processes), > just wanted to confirm the my understanding with the experts. Thanks, the > PythonImport is actually exactly what I need for the watchdog thread. > > However, it should be possible to share state between apache child processes > by using something like memcached right? Using memcached is certainly an option. For a bit of information on sharing issues see: http://www.dscpl.com.au/wiki/ModPython/Articles/TheProcessInterpreterModel The only other away around it would be to not use mod_python specific features and write your application as WSGI application instead. You could then use mod_wsgi, with embedded mode used on Windows and on UNIX systems use daemon mode with a single multitheaded daemon processes. You can compare how mod_wsgi is same/different to mod_python in respect of process use at: http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/wiki/ProcessesAndThreading Graham
|