[mod_python] Intermixing legacy CGI with mod_python

I'd say that if CGI is a definite requirement, mod_python isn't going to
be your best bet.

Grisha


On Wed, 26 May 2004, Orr, Steve wrote:

> Thanks, at least I don't feel too ignored. :-)
>
> I did a benchmark test with mod_python which included maintaining a pool
> of database connections. By not having to connect to the database for
> each CGI script and not having to constantly reload the Python
> interpreter I was able to demonstrate that a mod_python implementation
> would perform 100 times faster.
>
> I'm really just interested in CGI application performance and not Apache
> handlers, publisher, or psp so would I be better off with fastcgi? (We
> only need to run on Apache.)
>
> Anyone have experience with both mod_python and fastcgi and care to give
> candid feedback?
>
> AtDhVaAnNkCsE
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gustavo C?rdova Avila [mailto:gustavo.cordova at q-voz.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 10:05 AM
> To: Orr, Steve; mod_python at modpython.org
> Subject: RE: [mod_python] Intermixing legacy CGI with mod_python
>
>
> >
> > Regarding this topic... Your collective silence is
> > deafening... And discouraging! Doesn't anyone on this list
> > have ANY experience with this?
> >
>
> Have you tried it on a test server?
>
> Most of us on the list, probably, have more experience running
> mod_python
> application as handlers or using publisher or psp, that would surely
> account for this deafening silence.
>
> Maybe.
>
> -gus
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mod_python mailing list
> Mod_python at modpython.org
> http://mailman.modpython.org/mailman/listinfo/mod_python
>