Orr, Steve
sorr at rightnow.com
Wed May 26 11:36:19 EDT 2004
Thanks, at least I don't feel too ignored. :-) I did a benchmark test with mod_python which included maintaining a pool of database connections. By not having to connect to the database for each CGI script and not having to constantly reload the Python interpreter I was able to demonstrate that a mod_python implementation would perform 100 times faster. I'm really just interested in CGI application performance and not Apache handlers, publisher, or psp so would I be better off with fastcgi? (We only need to run on Apache.) Anyone have experience with both mod_python and fastcgi and care to give candid feedback? AtDhVaAnNkCsE -----Original Message----- From: Gustavo Córdova Avila [mailto:gustavo.cordova at q-voz.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 10:05 AM To: Orr, Steve; mod_python at modpython.org Subject: RE: [mod_python] Intermixing legacy CGI with mod_python > > Regarding this topic... Your collective silence is > deafening... And discouraging! Doesn't anyone on this list > have ANY experience with this? > Have you tried it on a test server? Most of us on the list, probably, have more experience running mod_python application as handlers or using publisher or psp, that would surely account for this deafening silence. Maybe. -gus
|