|
Graham Dumpleton
graham.dumpleton at gmail.com
Thu May 27 20:25:43 EDT 2010
2010/5/28 Raphaël B. <nashii at gmail.com>: > Hi, > > Is it possible to have something like psp with mod_wsgi ? > 'cause I have programmed some pages with psp (i don't really like publisher > ..) and I would like to continue using it. > > Is it as simple as for mod_python to use sessions ? > > It's really difficult to change the way we make things ... PSP is mostly a standalone module in mod_python. There are dependencies on the mod_python request object, forms and sessions. One could though certainly port the PSP templating aspect to work as part of a WSGI mini framework of some sort, but any interaction with the request object, forms and sessions would likely need to change to match what the mini framework provides. Graham > 2010/5/28 Graham Dumpleton <graham.dumpleton at gmail.com> >> >> On 28 May 2010 09:53, Jason Caldwell <jscnet99 at me.com> wrote: >> > Hi Graham -- >> > I would like to see mod_python continue on. Supporting Py3. >> >> Well, find like minded people and take on development and support of >> mod_python yourself. That is going to be the only solution. >> >> Knowing all the problems with how to deal with all the Unicode/bytes >> issues in Python 3.X it is going even be a major task working out what >> the interfaces should look like and where bytes versus Unicode should >> be used. The argument about this for WSGI has been going on for almost >> 2 years now I think and still now final resolution and WSGI is a lot >> smaller interface than mod_python. >> >> Also, there are a significant number of bugs in mod_python and >> seriously they would need to be addressed before even trying to go to >> Python 3.X. All up it is going to need some serious commitment and >> right now there is no one who who has said they are prepared to do >> that. >> >> > I find the frameworks annoying and really love the simplicity and >> > lightness of mod_python. >> >> Did you look at Werkzeug and Flask as I mentioned in the blog. These >> are not heavy weight frameworks. Flask is specifically what is called >> a micro framework. Even if you didn't like Flask, it wouldn't take >> much effort to use Werkzeug to create an alternate micro framework >> that has usage pattern not too dissimilar to mod_python publisher. But >> one has to question whether that is a good idea either given the >> various design issues in publisher around multiple URLs being able to >> be used to map to a single resource and the problems that causes. Do >> you preserve these bad design issues or fix them? >> >> Graham >> >> > On May 27, 2010, at 4:33 PM, Graham Dumpleton wrote: >> > >> >> I have warned about this before on the list, but it is getting closer >> >> now. >> >> >> >> If you are a user of mod_python, read my blog post about the topic at: >> >> >> >> >> >> http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2010/05/modpython-project-soon-to-be-officially.html >> >> >> >> Graham >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Mod_python mailing list >> >> Mod_python at modpython.org >> >> http://mailman.modpython.org/mailman/listinfo/mod_python >> > >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mod_python mailing list >> Mod_python at modpython.org >> http://mailman.modpython.org/mailman/listinfo/mod_python > >
|