|
Raphaël B.
nashii at gmail.com
Thu May 27 20:18:13 EDT 2010
Hi, Is it possible to have something like psp with mod_wsgi ? 'cause I have programmed some pages with psp (i don't really like publisher ..) and I would like to continue using it. Is it as simple as for mod_python to use sessions ? It's really difficult to change the way we make things ... Raphaël 2010/5/28 Graham Dumpleton <graham.dumpleton at gmail.com> > On 28 May 2010 09:53, Jason Caldwell <jscnet99 at me.com> wrote: > > Hi Graham -- > > I would like to see mod_python continue on. Supporting Py3. > > Well, find like minded people and take on development and support of > mod_python yourself. That is going to be the only solution. > > Knowing all the problems with how to deal with all the Unicode/bytes > issues in Python 3.X it is going even be a major task working out what > the interfaces should look like and where bytes versus Unicode should > be used. The argument about this for WSGI has been going on for almost > 2 years now I think and still now final resolution and WSGI is a lot > smaller interface than mod_python. > > Also, there are a significant number of bugs in mod_python and > seriously they would need to be addressed before even trying to go to > Python 3.X. All up it is going to need some serious commitment and > right now there is no one who who has said they are prepared to do > that. > > > I find the frameworks annoying and really love the simplicity and > lightness of mod_python. > > Did you look at Werkzeug and Flask as I mentioned in the blog. These > are not heavy weight frameworks. Flask is specifically what is called > a micro framework. Even if you didn't like Flask, it wouldn't take > much effort to use Werkzeug to create an alternate micro framework > that has usage pattern not too dissimilar to mod_python publisher. But > one has to question whether that is a good idea either given the > various design issues in publisher around multiple URLs being able to > be used to map to a single resource and the problems that causes. Do > you preserve these bad design issues or fix them? > > Graham > > > On May 27, 2010, at 4:33 PM, Graham Dumpleton wrote: > > > >> I have warned about this before on the list, but it is getting closer > now. > >> > >> If you are a user of mod_python, read my blog post about the topic at: > >> > >> > http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2010/05/modpython-project-soon-to-be-officially.html > >> > >> Graham > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Mod_python mailing list > >> Mod_python at modpython.org > >> http://mailman.modpython.org/mailman/listinfo/mod_python > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mod_python mailing list > Mod_python at modpython.org > http://mailman.modpython.org/mailman/listinfo/mod_python > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm_cfg_has_not_been_edited_to_set_host_domains/pipermail/mod_python/attachments/20100528/2d32f916/attachment.html
|