Bart
scarfboy at gmail.com
Mon Aug 11 06:20:05 EDT 2008
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Mark D'Ascenzo <markdd at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Bart, > > Did you ever figure this out? I'm having the same problem andguessing > I'm using the wrong handlers in my python script. Anyguidence you > could offer on this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! -mark I didn't try to. I suspected it was some nasty assumption that would be too low-level to fix immediately. On the short term it was much easier to work around with an client-side change telling the AJAX library to use GET instead. I do want to figure out what caused it, though am a little busy right now. The wrong handlers how? As far as I can remember, the only difference between GET and POST in mod_python seems to be a few relatively minor parsing details and, in case of publisher, some sometimes nasty assumptions that you cannot neatly avoid (IIRC. Then again, I'm prejudiced against publisher.) Do you use vampire? --Bart >> 2008/6/24 Bart <scarfboy at gmail.com>: >>> I'm getting a 411 Length Required ("A request of the requested method >>> POST requires a valid Content-length.") in response to a >>> XMLHttpRequest, but that error does not seem to report the real >>> problem; Firebug and Tamper Data clearly show "Content-Length" with >>> value "30". >>> >>> I can probably hack the JS to make it use GET instead (which seems to >>> work), but I figured I'd check whether this is a known bug first. >>> Could this be 3.1-specific? >>> >>> Regards, >>> --Bart Alewijnse
|