Emiliano Moscato
moski666 at gmail.com
Wed Jan 24 22:23:12 EST 2007
Ok, I'm sorry but I didn't know the mechanism, I'm an old user of free software and open source, but new in collaborating :) Regards 2007/1/25, Graham Dumpleton <grahamd at dscpl.com.au>: > > Emiliano Moscato wrote .. > > Hi all; > > > > Even though nobody answer my question about "application/xml" > > I already pointed out the following in the original discussion: > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-29 > > The issue is to what degree mod_python.publisher should be generalised > to allow stuff beyond what it can do now. Making such a change needs a > consensus from enough people who understand the issues that changing > it would be a good idea. Although I have raised it previously no one has > ever commented on it. > > Graham > > > here is the > > 0.3 version patch for problem with "multipart/*", available for python > > 2.3;) > > I think that it'll work... > > Regards > > > > Emiliano > > > > # figure out boundary > > try: > > i = ctype.lower().rindex("boundary=") > > end = [ctype.find(';', i+9),ctype.find(' ', i+9)] > > def not_minus_one(x): return x != -1 > > filter(not_minus_one, end) > > if len(end) > 0: > > boundary = ctype[i+9:min(end)] > > else: > > boundary = ctype[i+9:] > > if len(boundary) >= 2 and boundary[0] == boundary[-1] == '"': > > boundary = boundary[1:-1] > > boundary = re.compile("--" + re.escape(boundary) + > "(--)?\r?\n") > > > > 2007/1/24, Graham Dumpleton <grahamd at dscpl.com.au>: > > > > > > Thanks, I've added a link to this in issue: > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-210 > > > > > > Note though that patch as is can't be used as it looks like you use > "set" > > > which only > > > newer versions of Python support. Python 2.3 is still supported by > > > mod_python. > > > > > > A similar thing to this splitting up has to be done for cookies, so > > > something like > > > the Cookie._parse_cookie might be able to be done. > > > > > > Graham > > > > > > Emiliano Moscato wrote .. > > > > Hi, I'm sorry, I've forgot to send this lines: > > > > > > > > # figure out boundary > > > > try: > > > > i = ctype.lower().rindex("boundary=") > > > > end = set([ctype.find(';', i+9), ctype.find(' ', i+9)]) > > > > end.discard(-1) > > > > if len(end) > 0: > > > > boundary = ctype[i+9:min(list(end))] > > > > else: > > > > boundary = ctype[i+9:] > > > > boundary_str = boundary > > > > if len(boundary) >= 2 and boundary[0] == boundary[-1] == > > > '"': > > > > boundary = boundary[1:-1] > > > > boundary = re.compile("--" + re.escape(boundary) + > > > "(--)?\r?\n") > > > > > > > > > > > > except ValueError: > > > > raise apache.SERVER_RETURN, apache.HTTP_BAD_REQUEST > > > > > > > > > > > > Is a little long, but I didn't find a shorter way. > > > > > > > > Graham et all, I'm interested on the another tip (how to treat xml > > dom > > > > models), I'd like to know your opinion about my opinion sent with > the > > > first > > > > bugfix. I'd like to use mod_python (and publisher handler if > possible) > > > > in > > > > our framework. > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Emiliano > > > > > > > > 2007/1/17, Graham Dumpleton <grahamd at dscpl.com.au>: > > > > > > > > > > Emiliano Moscato wrote .. > > > > > > Hi; > > > > > > > > > > > > I've followed my tiny work with FieldStorage. > > > > > > I changed the line: > > > > > > boundary = ctype[i+9:] > > > > > > for: > > > > > > boundary = ctype[i+9:ctype.find(';',i+9)] > > > > > > to fix the problem with boundary. > > > > > > > > > > I don't think this will always work. Where there is no semicolon > > then > > > > the > > > > > result would be: > > > > > > > > > > boundary = ctype[i+9:-1] > > > > > > > > > > This would have the affect of dropping off the last character in > > the > > > > value > > > > > which may be part of the boundary tag or the quote which might > > > surround > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > > > Graham > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've tried to use this method without any other change to > > > FieldStorage > > > > > > and > > > > > > works. I only need this bugfix and it is a good new for me. > > > > > > On the other hand, I was thinking about the matter with > > > > > "application/xml" > > > > > > serialize method and the name of the method says all: who uses > > > > > > "application/xml" as serialize method waits in the server for an > > xml > > > > > > document, not for its mapping to a dict, and it have nothing to > > do > > > > with > > > > > > xforms. > > > > > > For example: cherryPy, where I come from, uses the same > philosophy > > > > of > > > > > put > > > > > > the form fields as attributes of an object, but when it receives > > an > > > > > > "application/xml" puts it available in "threadData" attribute. > > > > > > Thanks for the attention :) > > > > > > > > > > > > Emiliano > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > mOsKi > > > > "No hay nada que uno haga mal , lo que hay es poco vino." Autor > Anonimo > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > mOsKi > > "No hay nada que uno haga mal , lo que hay es poco vino." Autor Anonimo > -- mOsKi "No hay nada que uno haga mal , lo que hay es poco vino." Autor Anonimo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm_cfg_has_not_been_edited_to_set_host_domains/pipermail/mod_python/attachments/20070125/8054e82b/attachment.html
|