Jim Gallacher
jpg at jgassociates.ca
Fri Mar 24 12:11:34 EST 2006
Ville Silventoinen wrote: > On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote: > >> Ville Silventoinen wrote: >> >>> >>> One colleague suggested using a named pipe. The mod_python process >>> would fork a child process, which would set up the named pipe for the >>> decompressed stream. The parent would wait until this is done and >>> then use the named pipe filename with req.sendfile. Any idea if >>> something like that would work? >> >> >> I have not idea but it seems rather complicated and would still >> require modifying requestobject.c to expose the apache ap_send_fd >> call. I'm not convinced it would be worth the effort. What are you >> trying to achieve exactly that makes your orginal solution unacceptable? >> > I was just curious if anyone has tried something like that or if my > solution is somehow faulty or slow compared to the sendfile. Sorry for > asking stupid questions. They are not stupid questions, just premature optimizations. :) Jim
|