|
Jim Gallacher
jpg at jgassociates.ca
Tue Mar 7 17:13:26 EST 2006
Graham Dumpleton wrote: > Jim Gallacher wrote .. > >>Graham Dumpleton wrote: >> >>>Hans-Joachim Ehlers wrote .. >>> >>> >>>>FYI: >>>>I was not able to build mod_python 3.2.8 because of some trashy C++ style >>>>comment lines within the source code which at least the IBM VAC v6 compiler >>>>( ANSI, C89,C99 compatible ) can not handle. I think even the GCC compiler >>>>with the option " pedantic" would fail. >>>>I did not test any further because it looks like getting into a nightmare >>>>again. >>>> >>>>So thanks for the improment of quality within the code. >>> >>> >>>We cannot fix where this occurs if you do not tell us where. >>> >>>We are aware of there being some C++ style comments in the >>>code and they have been getting weeded out when found, but >>>we don't have compilers which complain about the comments >>>in the first place. Thus, if you record where they occur it will >>>be fixed quicker. >> >>I think I've cleaned out all of the offending comments in svn trunk already. > > > That is what I thought too and I couldn't find any when I looked again. > Even checked .l and .h.in files. So unless the compiler on AIX is > getting confused by something that looks like a C++ style comment inside > of a C comment, not sure what the issue is and why it is more important > that actual compiler errors and affected code are posted. Except that Hans-Jaochim is using 3.2.8, which still has some C++ comments scattered about. I fixed the comments in the dev branch after 3.2.7 was released. Jim
|