|
Graham Dumpleton
grahamd at dscpl.com.au
Wed Nov 23 18:42:55 EST 2005
Sorry, quick answer as have practically no time for the next week to read email. Already gotten in trouble for sending this. :-) The issue has been discussed previously and I posted some sample code which might be able to be adapted to create a loadable module for Python usable in context of mod_python to achieve some of what you want. See mailing list archive: http://www.modpython.org/pipermail/mod_python/2005-May/018164.html http://www.modpython.org/pipermail/mod_python/attachments/ 20050523/9fa0275b/_mp_mod_ssl.obj http://www.modpython.org/pipermail/mod_python/attachments/ 20050523/9fa0275b/setup.obj This way of doing things means that there is no changes needed to mod_python, however, it can be a bit tricky to build the module in the first place. You'll just need to go back and forth through mailing list archive thread, as will not necessarily have more time to discuss it further. Graham On 24/11/2005, at 8:04 AM, Deron Meranda wrote: > I went ahead and coded and tested patches to mod_python 3.2.5b > which allow access to many mod_ssl parameters in early request > phases. > > I don't know how contributed enhancements like this are normally > handled, so I'm attaching the patch files to this email. If they > should instead go someplace else please let me know. > > Basically I added two new methods to the request object. > > req.is_https() > req.ssl_var() > > which will invoke the mod_ssl optional functions ssl_is_https() > and ssl_var_lookup(). They safely handle the case where > mod_ssl is not loaded or not available. > > They also work perfectly fine from say the PythonAccessHandler > phase, whereas using subprocess_env does not. > -- > Deron Meranda > > <requestobject.c.patch> > <modpython4.tex.patch> > _______________________________________________ > Mod_python mailing list > Mod_python at modpython.org > http://mailman.modpython.org/mailman/listinfo/mod_python >
|