dharana
dharana at dharana.net
Wed Jun 29 14:51:39 EDT 2005
Graham Dumpleton wrote: > > On 29/06/2005, at 8:06 AM, dharana wrote: > >> Graham Dumpleton wrote: >> >>> At a quick glance I can't see how this may or may not be used by the >>> Session >>> implementation, but isn't it possible to tie cookies to a particular >>> path >>> within in a domain? If the session was somehow associated with a >>> path, eg. >>> the handler root, could different session IDs for different parts of the >>> documentation tree simply be kept separate by appropriate use of Handler >>> directive in the root of each separate application context. How does the >>> existing ApplicationPath option come into this? Never exactly understood >>> what it did and thought that it was something related to having >>> different >>> session contexts? Seems to me that this might be better than fudging >>> what >>> name the session cookie uses. >> >> >> It seems Nicolas was faster. > > > Faster in what respect? Faster in answering with a solution. > What is better, a quick answer or a correct answer? :-) > I don't need to answer this, it's evident :) > Although I did notice that Nicolas' reply to my ApplicationPath mail got to > me before my original even came back from the mailing list. Spooky. > >> Anyways, I don't believe it will hurt to have the cookie name >> configurable btw. > > > One also shouldn't let rampant featureism creep in either. If there is > already > one good way of doing things, one shouldn't be adding in new stuff just > for the > sake of it. I also think about feature-creeping like you but in this case should I subclass or modify modpython's code to change a cookie name? > In practice I don't feel that the ability to change the > cookie name > would get used. The only good reason I can see for the ability to change > the > name is to eliminate "py" out of the cookie name to hide the fact that > Python > is used in an implementation of a site. > That's exactly what I was thinking about. -- dharana
|