[mod_python] Apache2 + mod_python + DragonFly?

As I said, I'm thick. I found the problem, which was something else to
do with libraries. Thanks anyway.
--Stefan

On 7/7/05, Graham Dumpleton <grahamd at dscpl.com.au> wrote:
> The error:
> 
>  Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_python.so into server:
>  /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_python.so: Undefined symbol
>  "pthread_create".
> 
> is nothing to do with DragonFly and is more fundamental than that.
> It would happen with any module you tried to use which made use
> of threading. I found that importing the "socket" module on a BSD
> system was generally enough to trigger the same problem.
> 
> However, since you think it is a DragonFly problem, then there isn't
> much I can do to help you.
> 
> Graham
> 
> LiteStar numnums wrote ..
> > That wasn't the point; the point was to know if I was simply brain
> > dead or that the package was the problem. Besides which, my LD_PRELOAD
> > and LD_LIBRARY_PATH were already modified. So, has anyone had a
> > problem with DragonFly or am I simply thick. Cheers!
> >  -- Stefan
> >
> > On 7/7/05, Graham Dumpleton <grahamd at dscpl.com.au> wrote:
> > > LiteStar numnums wrote ..
> > > > Anyone have any luck with the above configuration? I simply installed
> > > > all from package source, but apache pukes when attempting to load
> > > > mod_python:
> > > > Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_python.so into server:
> > > > /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_python.so: Undefined symbol
> > > > "pthread_create".
> > > > If not from packages, anyone running the above config from source?
> > Cheers!
> > >
> > > Start by reading the FAQ entry for this problem:
> > >
> > >   http://www.modpython.org/FAQ/faqw.py?query=pthread&querytype=simple&casefold=yes&req=search
> > >
> > > It comes about because Apache was linked with the pthread functions
> > > but Python/mod_python requires it. The FAQ gives a solution for BSD.
> > > Otherwise, you are going to have to relink Apache and ensure it uses
> > > library with the pthread functions in it.
> > >
> > > Graham
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > In possibility the eternal, rightly understood, continually lays out
> > only a small piece at a time
> > In possibility the eternal is continually near enough to be at hand
> > and yet far enough away to keep man advancing towards the
> > eternal, on the way, in forward movement. In this way the ternal lures
> > and draws a person, in the possible, from craddle to grave
> > if he just chooses to hope
> >    <<Soren Kierkegaard>>
> 


-- 
In possibility the eternal, rightly understood, continually lays out
only a small piece at a time
In possibility the eternal is continually near enough to be at hand
and yet far enough away to keep man advancing towards the
eternal, on the way, in forward movement. In this way the ternal lures
and draws a person, in the possible, from craddle to grave
if he just chooses to hope
   <<Soren Kierkegaard>>