Nic Ferrier
nferrier at tapsellferrier.co.uk
Fri Sep 3 01:38:54 EDT 2004
Jorey Bump <list at joreybump.com> writes: > Michael C. Neel wrote: > > > So what do we want? So far it is an app that runs under mod_python, and > > should require a data store. If we are going to measure preformance, > > then the data store needs to be defined; otherwise the guy who uses dbm > > files is at a loss to the guy who uses MySQL. I think preformance is > > important, and also SQL interaction (after all, how many apps are you > > working on for customers using dbm files as the main data store?). > > > > Now, at the risk of getting the thread off topic and into a flame war, > > I'm going to say that we should state it uses MySQL and also provide the > > database as well. The app shouldn't need any advanced database > > features, this wouldn't be showing off the framework anyway. Also, if > > this gets some steam, someone might be able to convince sourceforge to > > host the results of the bake off, and they use MySQL. > > But some frameworks provide or use an alternative data store (Karrigell, > for one). I know I'd be interested in how well these frameworks trade > off performance for ease of use. Absolutely. This sort of thing could well be a a feature of the framework. It should be left for implementors to decide upon. Nic
|