Nic Ferrier
nferrier at tapsellferrier.co.uk
Fri Sep 3 01:10:18 EDT 2004
"Michael C. Neel" <neel at mediapulse.com> writes: > Now, at the risk of getting the thread off topic and into a flame war, > I'm going to say that we should state it uses MySQL and also provide the > database as well. The app shouldn't need any advanced database > features, this wouldn't be showing off the framework anyway. Also, if > this gets some steam, someone might be able to convince sourceforge to > host the results of the bake off, and they use MySQL. I don't think that's a good idea. Let people do what they want with the backend... That's what RAD is about. If a framework has something particular to show about a particular backend then let it use that backend. Otherwise, let it be purely a matter for personal preference. I don't think that we can use this exercise to compare performance or anything like that... so there's no point being prescriptive about the back end. There is a point about being prescriptive about the front end. It's so the applications look (broadly) the same. > So the real question I have is who is going to (or knows someone who > will) create the prototype design of this application? By the end of next week I can probably have a timesheet tool up and running with some HTML that we could use as story boards. Nic
|