Jonathan Gardner
jgardner at jonathangardner.net
Tue Jun 10 12:27:03 EST 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 10 June 2003 07:49, Scott Russell wrote: > On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 09:35, Jonathan Gardner wrote: > > B) > > s = [] > > s.append('something') > > s.appent('something more') > > ... > > print "".join(s) > > > > B is far more efficient than A. This really shows up when you are > > concatenating hundreds or more elements. Anything below that, it really > > doesn't make too much of a difference. > > > > Momma always says, "Make sure you can read it first, only optimize it > after you profile." :) > You're right. This particular algorithm has been tested and profiled. I gave you the numbers I have found when I have done profiling. That is why I use this almost everywhere I have to concatenate multiple strings together. While it is true you shouldn't spend too much time optimizing on your first iteration of writing your code, it is silly to use methods you know are inefficient when comparable methods that are efficient exist and are well-tested. It just makes more work for the second and beyond iterations. - -- Jonathan Gardner <jgardner at jonathangardner.net> (was jgardn at alumni.washington.edu) Live Free, Use Linux! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+5jEKWgwF3QvpWNwRAtoKAKC7By+oNZoYeO6o8XYm3i5phzjXhACfUC+o p82lLQ5P+TDytSP2zHDkZHE= =gHW1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|