[mod_python] PSP bug report

That would eliminate conditional html.  However, it might be interesting if 
PSP had a special directive for conditional html such as two percent signs.

<%%
for x in xrange(10):
%>

-Dan

At 09:35 AM 12/4/2003 -0800, you wrote:
>Hi Grisha
>
>This may not be a bug, but it could still be worth the effort to make an
>%> be considered a newline as well - purely from a support perspective
>and the amount of annoyance it might save you and countless new users of
>PSP :-)
>
>Cheers
>
>Conrad
>
>On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 22:00, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
> > I think the best practice is to use a comment rather than a blank line:
> >
> > <%
> > for x in range(0):
> >       pass
> > # end for
> > %>
> >
> > Grisha
> >
> > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Dan W. wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I realized my error too late.  I needed a blank line after the loop.  PSP
> > > was considering the rest of the page to be part of the loop and since the
> > > loop did not execute neither did the html.
> > >
> > > -Dan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > At 09:14 PM 12/3/2003 -0600, you wrote:
> > >
> > > >It turns out that my problem wasn't related to the worker MPM after
> > > >all.  After minimizing the code down I've found that PSP fails on zero
> > > >element for loops.  The following PSP page should reproduce the problem.
> > > >
> > > ><%
> > > >for x in range(0):
> > > >     pass
> > > >%>
> > > >Hello world
> > > >
> > > >Does the PSP maintainer read this list?
> > > >
> > > >-Dan
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >At 05:54 PM 12/3/2003 -0600, you wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >I'm running into a weird problem with 3.1.2b and Apache 2.0.47 
> compiled
> > > > >under the worker MPM.  I have two Apache processes, each with 25
> > > > >threads.  I have a very simple PSP page which imports a simple .py 
> module
> > > > >and prints out a value.  The problem is that the page is only 
> served part
> > > > >of the time.  When it is served, it is correct (no tracebacks), 
> but if I
> > > > >do a browser reload a couple times it will eventually serve a blank
> > > > >page.  I can immediately do a browser reload a few more times and 
> get a
> > > > >few more blank pages.  Then if I wait a few seconds and do a browser
> > > > >reload again then it will serve up the proper page.
> > > > >
> > > > >I'm not quite sure how to verify it, but it appears as though one 
> process
> > > > >is having a problem with mod_python while the other process is 
> functioning
> > > > >properly.  Any suggestions on how I could verify this or other ideas?
> > > > >
> > > > >I wasn't able to find anything in the documentation on MPM 
> compatibility.
> > > > >
> > > > >Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > >-Dan
> > > > >
> > > > >_______________________________________________
> > > > >Mod_python mailing list
> > > > >Mod_python at modpython.org
> > > > >http://mailman.modpython.org/mailman/listinfo/mod_python
> > > >
> > > >_______________________________________________
> > > >Mod_python mailing list
> > > >Mod_python at modpython.org
> > > >http://mailman.modpython.org/mailman/listinfo/mod_python
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Mod_python mailing list
> > > Mod_python at modpython.org
> > > http://mailman.modpython.org/mailman/listinfo/mod_python
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mod_python mailing list
> > Mod_python at modpython.org
> > http://mailman.modpython.org/mailman/listinfo/mod_python
>--
>Conrad Steenberg <conrad at hep.caltech.edu>