|
Conrad Steenberg
conrad at hep.caltech.edu
Thu Dec 4 09:35:46 EST 2003
Hi Grisha This may not be a bug, but it could still be worth the effort to make an %> be considered a newline as well - purely from a support perspective and the amount of annoyance it might save you and countless new users of PSP :-) Cheers Conrad On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 22:00, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: > I think the best practice is to use a comment rather than a blank line: > > <% > for x in range(0): > pass > # end for > %> > > Grisha > > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Dan W. wrote: > > > > > I realized my error too late. I needed a blank line after the loop. PSP > > was considering the rest of the page to be part of the loop and since the > > loop did not execute neither did the html. > > > > -Dan > > > > > > > > At 09:14 PM 12/3/2003 -0600, you wrote: > > > > >It turns out that my problem wasn't related to the worker MPM after > > >all. After minimizing the code down I've found that PSP fails on zero > > >element for loops. The following PSP page should reproduce the problem. > > > > > ><% > > >for x in range(0): > > > pass > > >%> > > >Hello world > > > > > >Does the PSP maintainer read this list? > > > > > >-Dan > > > > > > > > > > > >At 05:54 PM 12/3/2003 -0600, you wrote: > > > > > > >I'm running into a weird problem with 3.1.2b and Apache 2.0.47 compiled > > > >under the worker MPM. I have two Apache processes, each with 25 > > > >threads. I have a very simple PSP page which imports a simple .py module > > > >and prints out a value. The problem is that the page is only served part > > > >of the time. When it is served, it is correct (no tracebacks), but if I > > > >do a browser reload a couple times it will eventually serve a blank > > > >page. I can immediately do a browser reload a few more times and get a > > > >few more blank pages. Then if I wait a few seconds and do a browser > > > >reload again then it will serve up the proper page. > > > > > > > >I'm not quite sure how to verify it, but it appears as though one process > > > >is having a problem with mod_python while the other process is functioning > > > >properly. Any suggestions on how I could verify this or other ideas? > > > > > > > >I wasn't able to find anything in the documentation on MPM compatibility. > > > > > > > >Thanks! > > > > > > > >-Dan > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > > >Mod_python mailing list > > > >Mod_python at modpython.org > > > >http://mailman.modpython.org/mailman/listinfo/mod_python > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > >Mod_python mailing list > > >Mod_python at modpython.org > > >http://mailman.modpython.org/mailman/listinfo/mod_python > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mod_python mailing list > > Mod_python at modpython.org > > http://mailman.modpython.org/mailman/listinfo/mod_python > > > _______________________________________________ > Mod_python mailing list > Mod_python at modpython.org > http://mailman.modpython.org/mailman/listinfo/mod_python -- Conrad Steenberg <conrad at hep.caltech.edu>
|