Stephane Bidoul
stephane.bidoul at softwareag.com
Wed May 9 14:07:33 EST 2001
Chris, Could you send me your driver script? I cannot reproduce the behaviour you describe with my own test scripts. BTW, do you have a multiprocessor machine? I know some problems have been reported but never reproced on MP WIN2K machines. -sbi > -----Original Message----- > From: mod_python-admin at modpython.org > [mailto:mod_python-admin at modpython.org]On Behalf Of Chris Trengove > Sent: 09 May, 2001 00:28 > To: Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy > Cc: mod_python at modpython.org > Subject: RE: [mod_python] Win32 threading issue > > > Grisha, > > Exactly what I see is variable in nature. The most usual > thing will be an > entry in the Apache error log like this > > [Tue May 08 16:47:37 2001] [error] PythonHandler hwtest: > Traceback (most > recent call last): > > [Tue May 08 16:47:37 2001] [error] PythonHandler hwtest: File > "e:\python20\lib\mod_python\apache.py", line 189, in Dispatch > result = > object(self.req) [Tue May 08 16:47:37 2001] [error] > PythonHandler hwtest: > File "c:/apache/apache/htdocs/python\hwtest.py", line 24, in handler > req.write("%d: %d\n" % (thread.get_ident(),counter)) > > [Tue May 08 16:47:37 2001] [error] PythonHandler hwtest: > IOError: Write > failed, client closed connection. > > When I use my Python driver script, which keeps going even if > no data is > returned from the server, I will often end up with an access violation > inside Apache.exe. > > "The instruction at "0x6ff71679" referenced memory at > "0x616c707b". The > memory could not be "read"." > > Actually, this location appears to be always the same -- when > it eventually > happens -- which might be after a significant number log > error messages. > After the access violation, one of my driver scripts stops, because it > receives a socket exception (10054, "Connection reset by > peer"), and the > other script continues merrily along. > > Occassionally other things can happen too -- I think it just > depends on > when the two threads conflict. As I mentioned earilier, one really > misterious occurrence is getting a "double message" returned > to one thread, > just as the other receives no data. Like this > > 632: 1515843<LF>568: 1572286 > > Here <LF> is a line feed, and the numbers before the colons > are the thread > IDs. I know that Apache has 50 threads which it is cycling through in > order. On this occassion 568 was due to be the thread to be > used for the > OTHER client. > > Chris > > At 09:47 AM 8/05/2001 -0400, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: > > > >Interesting... > > > >Another question - when you say a thread crashes, what > exactly do you see > >- is it something in the log or one of those dr. watson messages? > > > >On Tue, 8 May 2001, Chris Trengove wrote: > > > >> Grisha, > >> > >> I did have KeepAlive On, but it appears to make no > difference. I have just > >> tried with KeepAlive Off, and I get the same behaviour. > Also, the clients I > >> have been using would be closing the connection after each > request. As > >> clients I have been using a Python script with urllib, and > a little C++ > >> test program I wrote to see if trying a different client made any > >> difference. It didn't. > > > _______________________________________________ > Mod_python mailing list > Mod_python at modpython.org > http://www.modpython.org/mailman/listinfo/mod_python
|