Sylvan Ravinet
sylvan at ravinet.com
Thu Jul 13 02:12:15 EST 2000
hello, Gregory Trubetskoy wrote: > > Based on what I've seen in the newsgroups and the e-mails that I often > get, there seems to be a strong interest in html-embedded Python, in fact, > from what I gather, some people went through the trouble of downloading > and installing mod_python with that expectation only to find out that it > does no such thing. I'm among those... > I personally think it would be extremely nice if mod_python came bundled > with a (reliable and usable) handler that processed Python embedded within > HTML. I fully agree. >There a couple of questions that I have about it though - > > 1. First - is there really a great need for embedded Python? Are a lot of > people using PMZ and similar things and want them to work with mod_python? I'm not using PMZ, but I tried moderately to make it work with mod_python. I have to say that this Handler process is still cryptic to me. > 2. Would this be something that is more desired than other fancy things > like dynamic handler registration and a deeper integration with apache > api? In other words, would you rather have a cool embedded Python thing > than the ability to create your own Apache configuration directives? Is that so difficult to implement? Isn't this PMZ already usable for this purpose? (of course, with a good knowledge of mod_python) > 3. Should embedded Python be a project of its own, or would it be > appropriate to include it in the scope of mod_python? Why another project? As a dedicated python handler for mod_python, that sounds fine to me. (that can be only one example of mod_python use, really good indeed) Thank you for the good work already put in mod_python, Best regards, -Sylvan -- Do, or do not. There is no try. -Yoda Sylvan Ravinet: http://www.ravinet.com/sylvan/contact
|