|
Normando Hall
nhall at unixlan.com.ar
Fri Nov 7 13:54:00 EST 2008
Well, now run like a charm! I have follow your advices and I compiled under python2.4 with --with-python=/usr/bin/python2.4 Thnak you very much Normando Graham Dumpleton escribió: > 2008/11/6 Normando Hall <nhall at unixlan.com.ar>: > >> I was reading your response and clarified some questions and I think I can >> run everything. >> >> I have python 2.3 installed by default and can not uninstall it for >> compatibility reasons. It is installed in /usr/lib/python2.3 and access it >> through the file (which is on the PATH) "python" in /usr/bin. >> >> Python 2.4 installed under /usr/lib/python2.4 and access to it is through >> "python2.4" in /usr/bin. >> >> So, if I ran python -V I get: >> [root @ devel-server conf] # python -V >> Python 2.3.4 >> >> On the other hand, if I run python2.4 -V I get: >> [root @ devel-server conf] # python2.4 -V >> Python 2.4.2 >> >> What I need to do is to compile mod_python against python 2.4, but not as I >> did before. Before I moved >> cp /usr/bin/python2.4 /usr/bin/python >> >> and I was by default when running python I get python 2.4.2 >> >> What I need to do is to compile mod_python against python 2.4 but tell that >> uses /usr/bin/python2.4 instead of /usr/bin/python >> >> Is there a way to do it? >> > > If both are already installed under /usr, then use: > > ./configure --with-python=/usr/bin/python2.4 > > I believe this is documented in the installation instructions in the > source code. > > That should just work without any fiddles in Apache startup scripts. > The fiddles would only be necessary if had to install second Python > version under different root and so 'python' executable found by > mod_python at startup was for wrong version. > > Note that that mod_python looks for 'python' executable is only so it > can work out where corresponding lib directory is, it doesn't actually > run the 'python' executable as it already embeds the Python > interpreter code. > > Graham > > >> Thank you >> Normando >> >> Graham Dumpleton escribió: >> >> 2008/11/6 Normando Hall <nhall at unixlan.com.ar>: >> >> >> Opsss, sorry. >> >> Surftrackr is the best squid/dansguardian log analizer app I can found on >> the web: http://surftrackr.net >> >> >> That is a Django sub application by the look of it. >> >> Lets go backwards for a moment, why do you need mod_python for Python >> 2.3 still. Why can't you just compile and install mod_python compiled >> against newer version of Python and use that for everything. That way >> you don't need mod_python to handle two versions of Python. >> >> To do this you just need to install newer version of Python under >> /usr/local. You may though need to do a fiddle in Apache startup >> scripts to make sure it picks up Python from correct place. >> >> BTW, if only wanting to host Django, you might also look at mod_wsgi, >> it can be a bit easier to configure especially in respect of pointing >> it at correct Python version as that can be overridden if need be as >> part of Apache configuration files and don't have to fiddle Apache >> startup files like with mod_python. >> >> Graham >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Normando >> >> Graham Dumpleton escribió: >> >> 2008/11/6 Normando Hall <nhall at unixlan.com.ar>: >> >> >> Graham Dumpleton escribió: >> >> 2008/11/6 Normando Hall <nhall at unixlan.com.ar>: >> >> >> Hello dear. >> >> I am really neubie with python, so sorry for the questios if it is very >> silly. >> >> I have searched at the list, google, etc, and I can't to get an answer to my >> issue. >> >> I have apache 2.0.x running at my server, and python 2.3.4 and python 2.4.x. >> Python 2.3 is the default and I can't to upgrade because use yum and I want >> to avoid inconcistenteces at my server in future updates. But some >> applications need python 2.4, and then I call directly with "python2.4" >> because it is at the path. Python 2.3 is simple "python". >> >> My question is: Can I use two mod_python (each one compiled under correct >> python version) and loaded in apache as two differente modules? For instance >> mod_python.so and mod_python2.so. I presume it is not possible. >> >> Can you give me some light to this issue? >> >> >> No. >> >> If your applications are WSGI capable, use fastcgi/flup instead. >> >> Graham >> >> >> >> >> Hello Graham and thanks for the fast reply. >> >> I want to use Django and a module named Surftracr for squid reports with web >> access. I don't know what mean WSGI, but if you can confim these >> applications are WSGI, I will look at fastcgi/flup options. >> >> >> Django can host on FASTCGI so that is okay. I don't know what Surftracr is. >> >> PS. Please use reply-all and keep discussion on list. >> >> Graham >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm_cfg_has_not_been_edited_to_set_host_domains/pipermail/mod_python/attachments/20081107/1a7266fe/attachment.html
|