|
Massimo Di Pierro
MDiPierro at cs.depaul.edu
Sat Jun 21 10:44:27 EDT 2008
Dear Graham, a couple of months ago you send me some very constructive comments about web2py. In particular you suggested that we replaced all relative paths with absolutes paths. I really appreciate your advice and this issue was addressed within one week of your email. If there is any other issue that you find with the web2py source code, please let us know and it will be addresses. At this point we are not aware of any open issue. You also refer to "heard various critiques by others about it". Could you be more explicit? Unfortunately there are many incorrect posts online about web2py written by people who have not tried it or read the specs. Massimo Graham Dumpleton graham.dumpleton at gmail.com write: > All the major frameworks support WSGI, Django, TurboGears, Pylons, > CherryPy, web.py and up and comers such as Werkzeug. > Although Django may say use mod_python, general consensus is rapidly > moving to use of mod_wsgi, it is just that developers who maintain web > site haven't decided yet to make a statement that mod_wsgi is equally > as capable as mod_python. > As to web2py, it would not be one of my first choices. It may be more > glitzy and have better marketing speak around it, but having seen some > of the code in it and heard various critiques by others about it, I'd > be looking elsewhere. I'd probably suggest Django for high level > framework and Werkzeug if you want a more low level nuts and bolts > approach. > > Graham -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm_cfg_has_not_been_edited_to_set_host_domains/pipermail/mod_python/attachments/20080621/523ece9c/attachment.html
|