Graham Dumpleton
grahamd at dscpl.com.au
Wed Jan 24 17:16:57 EST 2007
Thanks, I've added a link to this in issue: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-210 Note though that patch as is can't be used as it looks like you use "set" which only newer versions of Python support. Python 2.3 is still supported by mod_python. A similar thing to this splitting up has to be done for cookies, so something like the Cookie._parse_cookie might be able to be done. Graham Emiliano Moscato wrote .. > Hi, I'm sorry, I've forgot to send this lines: > > # figure out boundary > try: > i = ctype.lower().rindex("boundary=") > end = set([ctype.find(';', i+9), ctype.find(' ', i+9)]) > end.discard(-1) > if len(end) > 0: > boundary = ctype[i+9:min(list(end))] > else: > boundary = ctype[i+9:] > boundary_str = boundary > if len(boundary) >= 2 and boundary[0] == boundary[-1] == '"': > boundary = boundary[1:-1] > boundary = re.compile("--" + re.escape(boundary) + "(--)?\r?\n") > > > except ValueError: > raise apache.SERVER_RETURN, apache.HTTP_BAD_REQUEST > > > Is a little long, but I didn't find a shorter way. > > Graham et all, I'm interested on the another tip (how to treat xml dom > models), I'd like to know your opinion about my opinion sent with the first > bugfix. I'd like to use mod_python (and publisher handler if possible) > in > our framework. > Thanks > > Emiliano > > 2007/1/17, Graham Dumpleton <grahamd at dscpl.com.au>: > > > > Emiliano Moscato wrote .. > > > Hi; > > > > > > I've followed my tiny work with FieldStorage. > > > I changed the line: > > > boundary = ctype[i+9:] > > > for: > > > boundary = ctype[i+9:ctype.find(';',i+9)] > > > to fix the problem with boundary. > > > > I don't think this will always work. Where there is no semicolon then > the > > result would be: > > > > boundary = ctype[i+9:-1] > > > > This would have the affect of dropping off the last character in the > value > > which may be part of the boundary tag or the quote which might surround > > it. > > > > Graham > > > > > > > I've tried to use this method without any other change to FieldStorage > > > and > > > works. I only need this bugfix and it is a good new for me. > > > On the other hand, I was thinking about the matter with > > "application/xml" > > > serialize method and the name of the method says all: who uses > > > "application/xml" as serialize method waits in the server for an xml > > > document, not for its mapping to a dict, and it have nothing to do > with > > > xforms. > > > For example: cherryPy, where I come from, uses the same philosophy > of > > put > > > the form fields as attributes of an object, but when it receives an > > > "application/xml" puts it available in "threadData" attribute. > > > Thanks for the attention :) > > > > > > Emiliano > > > > > > > > -- > mOsKi > "No hay nada que uno haga mal , lo que hay es poco vino." Autor Anonimo
|