Graham Dumpleton
grahamd at dscpl.com.au
Wed Jan 11 17:49:56 EST 2006
Hans-Joachim Ehlers wrote .. > > Graham Dumpleton" <grahamd at dscpl.com.au> 10/01/06 22:54 wrote > >Similar situation for the function cast you had to change in > requestobject.c. > >It just becomes to much of a pain to try and deal with the strangeness > of > >lessor used compilers. > I made which the gcc (3.2.2) a syntax check against the patched file > and it does not complains. > So it would be nice and if the change will not cause trouble to have in > the source code. Otherwise at the next revision me and other will run in > the same or similar issue If you put the code back to how it was originally, ie., no hack for the function cast, does GNU C compile it then? The problem is that the code as originally written is syntactically correct and is what it should be. It is a problem with the compiler or platform that is the real problem. It is not a good idea to introduce such a hack, which technically is wrong and may then cause another compiler or platform to fail. In other words, it may fix your particular problem, but may in turn cause problems for a lot of others if the change were made. Graham
|