Deron Meranda
deron.meranda at gmail.com
Wed Feb 15 19:07:13 EST 2006
On 2/15/06, Graham Dumpleton <grahamd at dscpl.com.au> wrote: > The _mp_mod_ssl module existed long before your suggested patch. > It was a proof of concept to show that the sort of SSL stuff could be > done without even needing to modify mod_python. > > I refered you to it when you first talked about your patches: > > http://www.modpython.org/pipermail/mod_python/2005-November/019609.html > > I take it you must not have looked at it. :-( Oh, sorry, I didn't recognize it by its name. Now I'm clearer :) I'm wondering though if Tomasz's problems are specific to that, or if they might also occur with the newer patch as well. Or if it's nothing to do with mod_python at all, and really is a mod_ssl configuration issue. Tomasz...I don't know how flexible you can be, but may it be possible for you to try using mod_python 3.2.7 with the proposed patch in MODPYTHON-94? It would really be valuable to get somebody testing on that before it goes into an official release. Plus it may even be worthwhile to compare _mp_mod_ssl with the new patch in your case, just to see if they both exhibit the same behavior or not. [Yes, I'm using the new patch + 3.2.7 today in a production system with no problems. But I don't use client certs very much, and I'm mostly hooking in the AccessHandler phase instead of Authen* phases. Also I'm just one test case.] -- Deron Meranda
|