Graham Dumpleton
grahamd at dscpl.com.au
Tue Oct 4 02:39:19 EDT 2005
Nicolas Lehuen wrote .. > OK, I get it. So either we revert back to the sys.modules hell that we had > in 3.1, or we just say that "pickling functions or classes that are defined > in published module is not supported". We have to move away from the sys.modules hell, and I'm a bit suspect on the idea of pickling functions in sessions anyway. I therefore have no problems with saying that pickling of function objects in a published module is not supported. :-) > This means that our good friend Gator Aide (what a fun pseudo) could solve > his problem by defining the functions and classes he wants to pickle in a > separate module, reachable from the Python path, and imported in the > published module as a default module. Yep. Using "import" from standard Python module search path would be only way it could be sanely done. Graham
|