Nick
nick at dd.revealed.net
Tue Jun 28 15:03:23 EDT 2005
Well, "bug" is too strong a word, and "most everything" is probably overstating the problem. But something should probably change :) Nick Nick wrote: > Then at the very least it's a documentation bug, since most everything > listed in parsed_uri will always be None. > > Nick > > Jim Gallacher wrote: > >> I don't have time to look at the code right now, but I believe that >> mod_python just returns the parsed_uri structure in the apache request >> record. If this is the case then it doesn't constitute a mod_python >> bug as such. I'll investigate further tonight if time permits. >> >> Jim >> >> Nick wrote: >> >>> Hm... is this a bug in mod_python? The original code checking >>> parsed_uri should have worked for that matter. >>> >>> Nick >>> >>> Ville Silventoinen wrote: >>> >>>> req.unparsed_uri.split(':')[0] returns just >>>> "/cgi-bin/vsi/auth/login.py". >>>> >>>> On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Nick wrote: >>>> >>>>> If that's all you need to check, then there are SSL variables in >>>>> the subprocess_env. Or, req.unparsed_uri.split(':')[0]. >>>>> >>>>> Nick >>>>> >>>>> Ville Silventoinen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> has anyone used req.parsed_uri fields successfully? >>>>>> >>>>>> def handler(req): >>>>>> req.content_type = "text/plain" >>>>>> for field in req.parsed_uri: >>>>>> req.write("%s," % str(field)) >>>>>> return apache.OK >>>>>> >>>>>> shows following: >>>>>> >>>>>> None,None,None,None,None,None,/cgi-bin/vsi/auth/login.py,None,None, >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mod_python mailing list >>> Mod_python at modpython.org >>> http://mailman.modpython.org/mailman/listinfo/mod_python >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Mod_python mailing list > Mod_python at modpython.org > http://mailman.modpython.org/mailman/listinfo/mod_python
|