Graham Dumpleton
grahamd at dscpl.com.au
Fri Jul 15 19:49:42 EDT 2005
On 16/07/2005, at 9:15 AM, Alejandro Mery wrote: > Hi, i need some directions :-) > > i need to have 'virtual' and real files on a tree, virtual paths have > a folder on the root which somehow gets the next folder, and again and > again. mixing different methods. /dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/file > > dir1 is simply a folder, dir2 is 'mounted' for a database, where dir3 > is simply a folder, and dir4 is a 'COW' (copy on write) of another > directory. > > i get the file into temporal location and now i call the file handler > over the temporal location but thinking its on the virtual one. > > but req.filename is read-only.. how should i solve this problem? what > do you recommend? In mod_python 3.X, req.filename can be modified. It was read only in mod_python 2.7 though. What base handler were you thinking of using, were you thinking of starting with something like mod_python.publisher or writing your own handlers from scratch? In respect of req.filename, its use becomes limited in a system where you have virtual directory concepts, or where you want to store the physical files somewhere else besides the actual document tree and have a proxy handler which serves them up. This is because req.filename is set based on what physical files Apache is able to identify and thus if the files are elsewhere or map to a virtual resource, it by itself doesn't help much. Thus, you still need to go off and do your own interpretation of req.path_info to identify the actual virtual resource. Anyway, that you feel you need to modify req.filename sounds like you have in mind a scheme like the WSGI middlware stack where middlware components can modify things like the script name and path info to reflect how much of the URI has been processed and also automatically remap it as necessary to support operation of nested middleware components. This componentised approach can certainly make it easier to implement more complex systems where there is a mix of physical and virtual resources. You might thus want to consider using WSGI on top of mod_python to make use of that top of model. Alternatively, I have been working on similar stuff for mod_python for a while, even before knowing that WSGI was doing a similar thing, but want I am doing is still in a slightly volatile state. If you are interested though, we can take the discussion off list..... Graham
|