|
David Fraser
davidf at sjsoft.com
Tue Sep 2 22:42:33 EST 2003
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: >On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, David Fraser wrote: > > > >>Python 2.3, and the easiest way to do that... >>would be to have an installer for mod_python 3.1a for Python 2.2! Grisha? >> >> > >Getting a version for Python 2.2 is tricky because the production >of the installer requires 2.3, so what I had to do in the past is compile >for 2.2, but then use 2.3 for the installer, so it's a bit of a pain. > >What we really need to do is figure out what is different between our >systems. > >Just to summarise, is this correct? (I am only concerned with 3.1.0a here, >NOT 3.0.3). > >"stock" means the binary from www.python.org, as opposed to Win32, Active >or compiled. All Apache is the binary from www.apache.org. > > | mod_py | Python | Apache | Win. | >------------------------------------------------------- >Perry | 3.1.0a | stock 2.3 | 2.0.47 | ? | OK >Grisha | 3.1.0a | stock 2.3 | 2.0.47 | 2000 | OK >David | 3.1.0a | stock 2.3 | 2.0.47 | 2000 | NOT OK >Laird | 3.1.0a | stock 2.3 | 2.0.47 | 2000 | NOT OK > >Grisha > > > To confirm: I'm working in Windows 2000 Tested stock Apache 2.0.47, stock Python 2.3, mod_python 3.1a, get error loading Module I tried running FileMon from SysInternals to see if there was some dependency etc it was trying to load that was failing, but couldn't see anything. It seems like it is loading the module, but not finding the Apache hooks inside it? (Just a guess) David
|