Daniel Popowich
dpopowich at mtrsd.k12.ma.us
Mon Dec 22 19:55:13 EST 2003
>> directory and send a "Location: http://host/foo/" header. I was >> first shocked by this (think of all the extra bytes flooding the >> 'net because of this!!), but understand it's the only way within >> the protocol to make relative links work. (Although it begs the >> question why the protocol doesn't have a Real-Location header, or >> some such, to let the browser know what the real url for the >> requested page should be without having to go fetch it.) > > A 301 status is Moved Permanently, so that is your "Real-Location" > header. In an ideal world browsers would update (or prompt to update) > bookmarks on such a status, but it looks like that's not going to > happen. I wasn't very clear. For pages that have moved or for pages that haven't moved but aren't in proper form (like my example, http://host/foo -> http://host/foo/) on the SAME server, it seems unfortunate that the servers can't return the page along with some header indicating that fact. For example, why can't a request for http://host/foo return http://host/foo/index.html with a header Real-Location: http://host/foo/ instead of returning a 30[12] with a Location header only to have the browser go back to the same server. Seems wasteful. The 30[12] with Location header makes perfect sense for pages moved to different servers. Dan
|