|
perry.tew at cibavision.novartis.com
perry.tew at cibavision.novartis.com
Fri Aug 29 13:09:13 EST 2003
Grisha,
My version of windows is Windows XP Version 2002.
FYI, I don't know what testing hardware you have, but we have XP and
Solaris 8 in house.
We'll also have some Solaris 9 shortly. Additionally, I can set up some
HPUX 11i boxes if needed.
I say this not to brag, but only to offer help if you need additional
platforms to run tests on for your
new alpha version.
Thanks,
Perry
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, David Fraser wrote:
> Python 2.3, and the easiest way to do that...
> would be to have an installer for mod_python 3.1a for Python 2.2!
Grisha?
Getting a version for Python 2.2 is tricky because the production
of the installer requires 2.3, so what I had to do in the past is compile
for 2.2, but then use 2.3 for the installer, so it's a bit of a pain.
What we really need to do is figure out what is different between our
systems.
Just to summarise, is this correct? (I am only concerned with 3.1.0a here,
NOT 3.0.3).
"stock" means the binary from www.python.org, as opposed to Win32, Active
or compiled. All Apache is the binary from www.apache.org.
| mod_py | Python | Apache | Win. |
-------------------------------------------------------
Perry | 3.1.0a | stock 2.3 | 2.0.47 | ? | OK
Grisha | 3.1.0a | stock 2.3 | 2.0.47 | 2000 | OK
David | 3.1.0a | stock 2.3 | 2.0.47 | 2000 | NOT OK
Laird | 3.1.0a | stock 2.3 | 2.0.47 | 2000 | NOT OK
Grisha
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.modpython.org/pipermail/mod_python/attachments/20030829/43917b96/attachment-0003.htm
|