Laird Shaw
lairdshaw at yahoo.com.au
Sat Aug 30 02:37:56 EST 2003
Yes that's right for me. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy" <grisha at modpython.org> To: "David Fraser" <davidf at sjsoft.com> Cc: "Laird Shaw" <lairdshaw at yahoo.com.au>; "Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy" <grisha at modpython.org>; <perry.tew at cibavision.novartis.com>; <Mod_python at modpython.org> Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 2:32 AM Subject: Re: [mod_python] Apache startup error using mod_python under Windows 2000 (have msvcr70.dll) > > > On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, David Fraser wrote: > > > Python 2.3, and the easiest way to do that... > > would be to have an installer for mod_python 3.1a for Python 2.2! Grisha? > > Getting a version for Python 2.2 is tricky because the production > of the installer requires 2.3, so what I had to do in the past is compile > for 2.2, but then use 2.3 for the installer, so it's a bit of a pain. > > What we really need to do is figure out what is different between our > systems. > > Just to summarise, is this correct? (I am only concerned with 3.1.0a here, > NOT 3.0.3). > > "stock" means the binary from www.python.org, as opposed to Win32, Active > or compiled. All Apache is the binary from www.apache.org. > > | mod_py | Python | Apache | Win. | > ------------------------------------------------------- > Perry | 3.1.0a | stock 2.3 | 2.0.47 | ? | OK > Grisha | 3.1.0a | stock 2.3 | 2.0.47 | 2000 | OK > David | 3.1.0a | stock 2.3 | 2.0.47 | 2000 | NOT OK > Laird | 3.1.0a | stock 2.3 | 2.0.47 | 2000 | NOT OK > > Grisha
|