|
Graham Dumpleton
graham.dumpleton at gmail.com
Wed Jun 9 00:19:33 EDT 2010
On 8 June 2010 23:07, Martijn Moeling <martijn at xs4us.nu> wrote: > This is the reason I made a MP2WSGI "framework" > Which is in fact a MP code compatible MP adapter for MOD_WSGI > > I run it in production but: > > I have not yet got the util and PSP modules to work since there are some technical issues I have not found the time to solve. > This could very well be a solution for many MOD_PYTHON users. > > (I stil need help on the parse_qs and parse_qsl functions for util to work) The mod_python source code says that are C implementations of: cgi.parse_qs cgi.parse_qsl Have how they work deviated over time? Graham > I plan on integrating PSP too, contributors are welcome > > see http://www.bitbucket.org/mmoeling/mp2mwsgi > > Martijn > > On May 28, 2010, at 2:25 AM, Graham Dumpleton wrote: > >> 2010/5/28 Raphaël B. <nashii at gmail.com>: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is it possible to have something like psp with mod_wsgi ? >>> 'cause I have programmed some pages with psp (i don't really like publisher >>> ..) and I would like to continue using it. >>> >>> Is it as simple as for mod_python to use sessions ? >>> >>> It's really difficult to change the way we make things ... >> >> PSP is mostly a standalone module in mod_python. There are >> dependencies on the mod_python request object, forms and sessions. One >> could though certainly port the PSP templating aspect to work as part >> of a WSGI mini framework of some sort, but any interaction with the >> request object, forms and sessions would likely need to change to >> match what the mini framework provides. >> >> Graham >> >>> 2010/5/28 Graham Dumpleton <graham.dumpleton at gmail.com> >>>> >>>> On 28 May 2010 09:53, Jason Caldwell <jscnet99 at me.com> wrote: >>>>> Hi Graham -- >>>>> I would like to see mod_python continue on. Supporting Py3. >>>> >>>> Well, find like minded people and take on development and support of >>>> mod_python yourself. That is going to be the only solution. >>>> >>>> Knowing all the problems with how to deal with all the Unicode/bytes >>>> issues in Python 3.X it is going even be a major task working out what >>>> the interfaces should look like and where bytes versus Unicode should >>>> be used. The argument about this for WSGI has been going on for almost >>>> 2 years now I think and still now final resolution and WSGI is a lot >>>> smaller interface than mod_python. >>>> >>>> Also, there are a significant number of bugs in mod_python and >>>> seriously they would need to be addressed before even trying to go to >>>> Python 3.X. All up it is going to need some serious commitment and >>>> right now there is no one who who has said they are prepared to do >>>> that. >>>> >>>>> I find the frameworks annoying and really love the simplicity and >>>>> lightness of mod_python. >>>> >>>> Did you look at Werkzeug and Flask as I mentioned in the blog. These >>>> are not heavy weight frameworks. Flask is specifically what is called >>>> a micro framework. Even if you didn't like Flask, it wouldn't take >>>> much effort to use Werkzeug to create an alternate micro framework >>>> that has usage pattern not too dissimilar to mod_python publisher. But >>>> one has to question whether that is a good idea either given the >>>> various design issues in publisher around multiple URLs being able to >>>> be used to map to a single resource and the problems that causes. Do >>>> you preserve these bad design issues or fix them? >>>> >>>> Graham >>>> >>>>> On May 27, 2010, at 4:33 PM, Graham Dumpleton wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I have warned about this before on the list, but it is getting closer >>>>>> now. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you are a user of mod_python, read my blog post about the topic at: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2010/05/modpython-project-soon-to-be-officially.html >>>>>> >>>>>> Graham >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Mod_python mailing list >>>>>> Mod_python at modpython.org >>>>>> http://mailman.modpython.org/mailman/listinfo/mod_python >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Mod_python mailing list >>>> Mod_python at modpython.org >>>> http://mailman.modpython.org/mailman/listinfo/mod_python >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mod_python mailing list >> Mod_python at modpython.org >> http://mailman.modpython.org/mailman/listinfo/mod_python > >
|