[mod_python] mod_pytyon, OSX, and PIL, oh my!

What are the names/paths of the modules/libraries you are talking
about and what is the output from running 'file' on them? That way we
can see what is and isn't a fat binary.

Also make sure you read:

  http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/wiki/InstallationOnMacOSX

This is for mod_wsgi, but same issues, even mentions PIL as a problem case.

Graham

2008/5/13 Jon McKamey <jmcKamey at neatreceipts.com>:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hey all. This is mod_python PIL integration issues. I tried sending it to
> PIL list as well, but I'm not getting any success there.
>
>
>
> I'm trying to get PIL and mod_python to run on Apache2 on a Mac running OSX
> 10.5*  I am to the point where PIL has been rebuilt for the 4 target
> processors.   If I run otool on it, I get the list of modules it loads, and
> not all of them are built for the 4 processors, some of which appear to be
> OS built-in libraries.
>
>
>
> So, the point I am stuck at:  It's not clear to me how and what to do to
> rebuild those modules, and it's not clear to me if it's even safe to rebuild
> and replace those modules with 4 processor versions of the files.  Has
> anyone reading this done this before?  Is that safe to do?  If not, what are
> the risks? And if so, can anyone recommend a toolset to do the rebuilding?
> Macports? Download the source and go? Any other suggestions or advice on
> this tricky topic?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance for any and all help. Mod_python and PIL rocks, and I
> can't wait to (finally) get it integrated into Apache.
>
>
>
> Hack on,
>
> - Jon McKamey
>
>
>
>  * To give some background, httpd is on OSX is build with 4 target
> processors, so everything loaded by it (mod_python, PIL, etc) has to be
> built to handle all 4 target processors.  Including all PIL and it's
> libraries.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>  Mod_python mailing list
>  Mod_python at modpython.org
>  http://mailman.modpython.org/mailman/listinfo/mod_python
>
>