mmokrejs at ribosome.natur.cuni.cz
Tue Jul 5 08:21:23 EDT 2005
Graham Dumpleton wrote: > > On 05/07/2005, at 9:25 PM, Martin MOKREJŠ wrote: > >> Graham Dumpleton wrote: >> >>> On 05/07/2005, at 4:11 PM, Nicolas Lehuen wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> What I suspect in Martin's case is that req.finfo returns None >>>> because of the global scope of his PythonHandler configuration, or >>>> something like that. Therefore, the publisher ends up executing the >>>> last branch which splits the requested file name into directory + >>>> func_path and adds index.py to the directory. I'll try to reproduce >>>> this behaviour and let you know about this. >>> >>> Except that Martin wasn't using your latest version of the publisher, >>> but that in the 3.1. as I understand it, so I don't think you can >> >> >> But yesterday I have upgraded to the snapshot posted. ;-) > > > Okay, I am mightily confused now. Going back to your original posting > and looking properly at the stack traces you were already using a > version newer than 3.1.4 even at that point. I have been making comments > on the basis you were using 3.1.. If it has at all been helpful As I said I had same problems with 3.1.4 before. Maybe the problem was because of the 2.4.1 python. I upgraded twice. Yesterday to some snapshot from apache.org, which was svn checkout around end of June, according to Nikolas it was missing just some recent cookies patches. Today have installed python-2.3.4 and picked up current svn and posted the testhandler outputs. Have to install few more packages into the python2.3 tree to play more with my testcases. Sorry for all the confusion. > then it has probably been by luck more than anything else. Can see > how Nicolas might have been confused about what I was going on about. > Anyway, since you are using unreleased code and I haven't looked > at it yet or tried to use, Nicolas will just have to sort it out. :-) Well, you have my sources so you know what all you can reproduce.